Sunday, January 13, 2013

The Paperboy

By Sati. Sunday, January 13, 2013 , , , , , , , ,
The Paperboy is one of the most divisive movies of the year - it got a fair share of terrible reviews and then it got a lot of positive responses from the audience that was entertained by the film. You probably know two things about the movie - that it includes a scene where Nicole Kidman is peeing on Zac Efron (in the film's defense - it's after he is stung by jelly fish and thanks to Friends we all know what needs to be done in this situation) and that this is a movie for which Kidman got the Golden Globe nomination. The fact that not many people actually got to see that trashy little gem is in its favor - The Paperboy is a fun ride filled with unpredictable twists and turns.

The film's protagonist is Jack Jansen (Zac Efron), young, good looking man who is helping out his brother - journalist Ward (Matthew MacConaughey) and his writer friend Yardley with their work on the article. They want to write about the case of Hillary Van Wetter (John Cusack) - the man convicted for death for killing a sheriff. Ward insists that the trial was not fair and Hillary never had a chance to talk about his version of events and he thinks that this will make for a good story and maybe they will even manage to give the convict a second chance at fair trial.
Enter Charlotte Bless (Nicole Kidman). She is a trashy, slutty hairdresser who loves dangerous men. She corresponds with a bunch of prisoners whom she never even met and she falls in love with Hillary through his letters in which he calls her "his angel". Charlotte is loud, shameless and very desirable - upon seeing her Jack instantly falls for her. What follows is the series of outrageous, occasionally bloody events that you won't be able to see coming. All of this is presented in the form of the story Jensen's housekeeper (Macy Gray) is telling to the papers.

In many ways The Paperboy reminded me of terrific Killer Joe - it's definitely not a movie for everyone with plenty of shocking moments, it features Matthew McConaughey pushing boundaries again and it is filled with scenes that are bound to make you uncomfortable. The peeing scene is actually nothing comparing to what goes down in this movie - when Hilary and Charlotte finally meet in prison they are prohibited to touch. What occurs is something that the audience named "telepathic sex scene" during which Hillary instructs Charlotte what to do and she moans like an animal, with Jack, Ward and Yardley present in the room. I had only one thought during all of that - "Mother of God what is this thing I'm witnessing?"
Though the film's script is messy and many times ridiculous - which I think was by design - it is filled with incredible performances. Zac Efron, who I'm told was in something called High School Musical (which I never seen, because, well, why would I?) was good here and delivered believable performance which was quite an accomplishment - to create the role of a regular human being in the film that is this bat shit crazy is truly an accomplishment. Matthew McConaughey proves for the fourth time in last year that he is fearless - he is one incredibly disturbing scene and after that his character hits the rock bottom. McConaughey is fantastic here and it's truly mind blowing how he turned his career around.

John Cusack is one of the actors who always annoy me, but he was perfectly cast here and did a very good job. His Hilary is an absolutely despicable, violent, racist, repulsive man. But the true star of the show is Nicole Kidman. Kidman did this movie for mere 60,000$ - she wanted to work with Lee Daniels so much and she really wanted to play raw and provocative character. She recently said that she wouldn't want to look back at her career and feel as if she played things safe. "Safe" is the last word that comes to mind when you are witnessing her incredible performance here.
Her Charlotte is the heart and the pulse of The Paperboy - it's astounding that under dyed hair, tons of make up and slutty cloths Kidman manages to make her character into a genuinely sweet person. She has terrible choice in men and she is deeply flawed but she realizes that - there are many moments when you can clearly see Charlotte is not just a dumb blonde and she knows that her life is far from being perfect. Kidman never allows her character to become one dimensional and though Charlotte's actions are at times truly obscene and shameless, the things she says vulgar and off putting, you can understand why Jack is so taken with her.

What I also liked about Kidman's work here is that it had a lot of parallels to her finest performance in To Die For. While in Gus van Sant's brilliant dark comedy Kidman played more of a killer barbie who will do anything to get ahead, here she plays the barbie that was tossed in the garbage, crawled out of it and decided to do whatever makes her happy at any given time. There is even a similar scene here to the one in To Die For with Kidman dancing with much younger man in the rain. Except in To Die For her goal was to manipulate and use that man and here her good hearted Charlotte simply wants to make him smile.
The film is directed by Lee Daniels, the very same Lee Daniels who made famous Precious. If you've seen that film you know what to expect - dark, filthy, unpleasant world. I need to mention Killer Joe again - it was rated NC-17 while The Paperboy was rated R. I was shocked. I think the only reason why William Friedkin's film got more restricted rating was the nudity - there is almost no nudity in The Paperboy but it's a truly shocking movie. True, nothing in it was as outrageous as now famous chicken scene from Killer Joe, but I was disturbed many times during this, manly during sexual "encounter" that happens between brutal Hillary and frightened Charlotte. Kidman may have few missteps in her career but I really admire her - especially for her courage in taking that role and being in a scene like this one.

The fact that so many dirty things happen in this movie and that the cinematography is so gorgeously lovely really creates quite an interesting effect - the film is beautifully shot with a great retro vibe to it (it takes place in the 60s), yet what we see at times is so disgusting you don't know what to think - is it ugly? Or is it disturbingly pretty? The music is fantastic too, with a wide selections of songs that add a lot of irony and whimsical, seductive charm to the film.
Sure it's far from perfect - the story frequently explodes and we are witnessing the pieces - it's all over the place. But the truth is - this movie was one of the most entertaining films of 2012 and I think the excellent performances alone are enough to watch it and enough to call the horrible reviews the movie got unjustified. Kidman delivers one of her best performances here and if you like her acting you really can't miss her Charlotte Bless.

The Paperboy is definitely not a film for those with the weak stomach - in fact it can cause some people to run away, screaming. But if you liked Killer Joe and Precious and if you enjoy pulpy, trashy fun chances are you will like this one too.
The Paperboy (2012, 107 min)
Plot: A directionless young man (Efron) helps his reporter brother (McConaughey) investigate the possible wrongful conviction of a man (Cusack) on death row, and in the process, falls for the woman (Kidman) whom the convict has been romancing through prison correspondence. The Paperboy is based on the 1995 novel by Peter Dexter.
Director: Lee Daniels
Writers: Lee Daniels (screenplay), Peter Dexter (novel)
Stars: Zac Efron, Matthew McConaughey, Nicole Kidman and John Cusack

RELATED POSTS:

32 comments:

  1. I'm excited to see this one soon, as I understood the movie has some great elements and acting but the overall story itself is lacking? Either way, I'm excited to see Efron as well, I do think he has some acting power in him past his basketball-singing movies, though he has a weird face from some angles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, to be fair I don't think the story was going to be important anyways, it's just the type of the movie where the craziness of the characters and filthy world they live in is the main part. I don't believe I saw Efron in anything else, but he was very good here!

      Delete
  2. Wacky, wild, and all-over-the-place, but well-acted and if there is anything worth seeing in this movie; it's definitely the performances by everybody here. Good review Sati.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, the performances were the best part! Thank you!

      Delete
  3. I'm actually really surprised you liked this movie as much as you did. I saw it in theaters and was just so bogged down by how messy the entire script was...I think my biggest qualm was Macy Gray's character was...and how sloppy the plot became. I did, however, love the trashy elements to it, and the performances were great. AND, loved the retro 60s vibe it nailed. Killer Joe is significantly better written and executed than Paperboy. This one is just a fun watch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't mind the plot problems when the film turns out to be fun, plus here it really didn't feel like the plot was all that important :) Oh Killer Joe is much better, I gave it 10/10 :)

      Delete
  4. Can't wait for this one. Films that are all over the place can be hit or miss with me, but I'm a fan of some recent ones, like The Rum Diary (loved it) and Savages. Plus, it's got Kidman and McConaughey! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really liked The Rum Diary and parts of Savages :) This one is better than these two, at least for me :)

      Delete
  5. 63 for me, I thought the direction was a tad unclear, with all of the distracting and uncomfortable scenes. I understood it, but not everyone will.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree wholeheartedly with your review. I saw the movie in theaters, and while I liked the movie, I understand why some may be turned off by it. But there's no denying the performances in this film were superb. Also, Efron is certainly becoming an excellent actor. If you haven't seen him in "Liberal Arts' you should check it out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't seen Libral Arts yet, but I heard good things about it, didn't know Efron was in it.

      Delete
    2. Efron plays Nat in Liberal Arts, the hippie/stoner dude who "motivates" Jesse.

      Delete
    3. Sounds fun, I'll try to see it!

      Delete
  7. Though I did like Precious, I really hated Shadowboxer. I'm still interested to see this just to see what the fuss is about. Maybe I'll download in a few weeks just to see how crazy it is. I really want to see Nicole Kidman pee on Zac Efron, who I do like.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shadowboxer was also by Daniels? I thought the Paperboy was the follow up to Precious, interesting! That scene is worth seeing :)

      Delete
  8. So glad you wrote this review. I just watched the film a few days ago, and I completely agree with everything you said here. It certainly is far from perfect (and definitely not for the squeamish), but nowhere near as bad as I was led to believe.

    And you're right, this is Kidman at her most unhinged, and possibly best. I thought she was remarkable.

    An absurd swamp film fully aware of its absurdity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I mean all those 0 reviews? Even I only gave two 0 reviews in my life out of 1,500+ movies and that only because I was personally offended on top of those being bad movies with no redeeming qualities.

      Kidman was fantastic, it's a shame her recognition will end on GG and SAG nominations.

      Delete
  9. Daniels is very hit or miss for me, I may wait until rental for this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's probably the way to go here :)

      Delete
  10. I am a big fan of movies with well-developed, flawed, quirky-ass characters, and it sounds like this one fits the bill. But I have no idea whether this would be my cup of tea at all. I may give it a go. Great review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure if they are well-developed :) If they are that is only because of the actors - but the characters are certainly vivid and flawed, no matter how messy & crazy the story gets :)

      It's kinda like the feature film version of some of the images from True Blood opening title sequence, if you ever seen it :)

      Thank you!

      Delete
  11. Hmm...interesting movie and cast. I might check it out. 75 is a good score, coming from you! Nice review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be honest this was more entertaining than some of the Best Picture nominees :)

      Delete
  12. I'm actually really interested to see this, despite some of the negative reviews. No idea when it comes out over here, probably some time in 2015 or something, but I definitely do want to check it out. Interested to see Zac Efron take on something edgy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure it will be available on DVD soon enough, maybe they are hoping to earn at least some money this way :)

      Delete
  13. I totally forgot that Killer Joe was NC-17. But yea, this sounds good. I'm a little disappointed that the peeing scene is because of a jellyfish, but perhaps I shouldn't be. It's less funny now, but I'll get over it. I'm glad Efron did a good job, though, because he never seemed too interesting to me. I'm all for nice surprises.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's actually a pretty hilarious scene because of Kidman's lines :)

      Delete
  14. Call me crazy...I just say the movie and couldn't turn away! Should have been movie of the year. Very edgy and horrific but believable. WOW!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you liked it! I thought it was fun and refreshing, shame the critical reception wasn't better.

      Delete
  15. please can someone give me a list of all the songs in paper boy - can't find the soundtrack anywhere but desperate to find the name especially of the last song. loved it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry I have no idea :( I'll try to post here if I find out anything.

      Delete